Triplett v. Steinmayer
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LENROOT, Associate Judge.
This is an interference proceeding wherein appeal has been taken by appellant from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming a decision of the Examiner of Interferences awarding to appellee priority of the invention defined in counts numbered 8 and 9 of the interference.
Other counts were involved in the decision appealed from, but they are not included in the appeal before us.
The counts here involved read as follows:
“8. A fuse device of the air expulsion type comprising, in combination, a fuse link housing, a repláceable fuse link…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Tansel v. HigonnetCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
- Landon v. GinztonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
- Hradel v. GriffithCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Joseph R. Hradel and Harold E. Staadt v. George L. Griffith, George A. Lyte and Franklin B. Wells, George L. Griffith, George A. Lyte and Franklin B. Wells v. Joseph R. Hradel and Harold E. StaadtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967