Legal Opinion
Pines v. McAllister
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided April 3, 1951No. Patent Appeal 5759PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
On August 4, 1944, an interference was declared between the patent applications of Maryan P. Matuszak, No. 467,873, filed December 4, 1942, and Sumner H. Mc-Allister, John Anderson and Walter H. Peterson, No. 428,656, filed January 29, 1942. The party McAllister et al. brought a motion to substitute the presently involved sole McAllister application, No. 606,475, filed July 21, 1945, for the joint application of McAllister et al. This motion was granted in a decision of the Primary Examiner dated December 14, 1945. At the same time that the interference was reformed to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. WalchCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
- Chandler v. MockCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
- Draeger v. BradleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
- Bijur v. BendixCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Brydle v. HonigbaumCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Robert A. Reiners v. Charles L. MehltretterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
- Tansel v. HigonnetCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
- In re ClintonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
- Landon v. GinztonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
- Henry W. Rimbach v. Willem Lambertus Wanmaker and Cornelis BakkerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966