James F. Gordon v. Burton F. Hubbard and Gaynard H. Fosdick
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WORLEY, Chief Judge.
Gordon 1 appeals from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences which awarded priority of invention of the subject matter set forth in the following count to the senior party, Hubbard and Fosdick: 2
1. A potentiometric device comprising a casing having a support block, a resistance element and a conductor bar in parallel spaced relationship and fixed to said support block, a travel block having means directly slidable upon said support block, a contact element secured to said travel block and slidably engaging said resistance element and said conductor bar, and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Frederick F. Blicke v. Gino R. TrevesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- William C. Elmore v. William F. SchmittCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
- John O. Paivinen v. Eugene A. SandsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Landon v. GinztonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
- Kenneth H. White v. Harold H. P. LemmermanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dr. Sakharam D. Mahurkar v. C.R. Bard, Inc., Davol Inc. And Bard Access Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- In Re Yarn Processing Patent Validity Litigation. Sauquoit Fibers Company v. Leesona Corporation, Kayser-Roth Corporation (In Its Own Name and D/B/A Kayser-Roth Hosiery Companyand Kayser-Roth Hosiery Co., Inc.) v. Leesona Corporation, Leesona Corporation v. The Duplan CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- F. Brantley Scott and John H. Burton v. Roy P. FinneyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Slip Track Systems, Inc. And Todd A. Brady v. Metal-Lite, Inc., Thomas R. Herren, and Gene N. Carpenter, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Sauquoit Fibers Co. v. Leesona Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.