Legal Opinion

People v. Hashimoto

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 27, 1976No. Crim. 27227PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COMPTON, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction entered in a nonjury trial for pandering in violation of Penal Code section 266i, which statute condemns among other things, the inducing, persuading or encouraging a female to become a prostitute.

Carlene Moriarty, a fulltime regularly employed policewoman assigned to the vice squad of the Los Angeles Police Department, undertook to investigate a complaint that prostitution was being conducted through the Japan Travel Bureau. Using the alias “Cici,” the officer called the travel bureau and talked to defendant Hashimoto on the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. DaughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. People v. HilleryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. People v. ReillyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. People v. MontgomeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. In Re DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. ZambiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  2. People v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. People v. JeffersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. People v. PattonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. People v. McNultyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API