Legal Opinion

People v. Zambia

California Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 2011No. S173490PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CORRIGAN, J.

Defendant Jomo Zambia was convicted of pandering in violation of Penal Code section 266i, subdivision (a)(2),1 which defines *970pandering as encouraging “another person to become” a prostitute.2 Here, the target of defendant’s encouragement was an undercover police officer. He contends that section 266i, subdivision (a)(2) does not apply when the target is already a prostitute or an undercover police officer acting as one. The trial and appellate court rejected this argument. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On June 8, 2007, Officer Erika Cruz was working undercover…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Lakin v. Watkins Associated IndustriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. AveryCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Murgia v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. People v. BouzasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. People v. Leonard CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. People v. BrimmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Kight v. Cashcall, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. People v. HubbardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Ryan v. RosenfeldCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API