Legal Opinion

People v. Daugherty

California Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1953No. Crim. 5366PublishedCited by 330 opinions

Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General, Doris H. Maier and Leo V. Mclnnis, Deputy Attorneys General, and Joseph Maddux, District Attorney (Sonoma), for Respondent.

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

This case comes to us by automatic appeal from a judgment of conviction of first degree murder imposing the death penalty, finding defendant sane, and from an order denying a new trial. Defendant made the twofold plea of not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity.

Defendant is a man about 50 years of age. He married Florena Daugherty, the victim of the homicide, in 1933, and they had five children, Barbara, Michael, Wanda, Margaret, and Jerry. The killing occurred in the early morning hours of February 28, 1952. Defendant did not testify at the trial and there was little dispute that he…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. People v. BenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. People v. CarmenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. People v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by330 opinions

  1. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Ex Parte GranvielCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. People v. HilleryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. People v. RedmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. People v. WeinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958

325 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API