Legal Opinion

People v. McNulty

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 29, 1988No. E003990PublishedCited by 14 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HEWS, Acting P. J.

Defendant was charged and convicted by a jury of three counts of pimping (Pen. Code, § 266h), 1 three counts of pandering (§ 266i), one count of conspiracy to commit pimping and one count of conspiracy to commit pandering (§ 182).

The court sentenced defendant to prison for a total of eight years, the maximum allowable term. There were no factors in aggravation or mitigation so the court gave him the midterm of four years as to one count and four years consecutive thereto as to three of the remaining counts, restrained only by the double-the-base-term prohibition of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. In Re LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. People v. HoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. In Re FossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. People v. WingoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. People v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Wooten v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. People v. Shields, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. Allen v. StrattonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API