Legal Opinion

Hinkel v. Crowson

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 12, 1927No. Docket No. 3191PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

Respondent, Ada M. Hinkel, as executrix, has been substituted for John M. Hinkel, the original plaintiff herein. The latter will 'be referred to as the plaintiff. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff sold and conveyed a certain lot to Florence G. Hinkel November 27, 1914, for the agreed price of $4,000; that she gave the plaintiff her promissory note, payable in monthly installments of $30 each, for the full purchase price; that although the note recites that it is secured by a mortgage it is not so secured; that thereafter she and defendant Crowson intermarried; that she died in October,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Doolittle v. McConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Davis v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. California Savings & Loan Society v. CulverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. In Re Estate of HellierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Churchill v. WoodworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Buxbom v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Luckey v. Superior Court of Los Angeles Cty.California Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Katz v. DriscollCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Miller v. JansenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Geneva Towers Ltd. Partnership v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API