Geneva Towers Ltd. Partnership v. City & County of San Francisco
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MORENO, J.
In this case, we consider what statute of limitations applies when a county or city fails to act upon a claim for refund of property taxes within six months and the taxpayer elects under Revenue and Taxation Code section 5141, subdivision (b) to “consider the claim rejected and bring an action” in superior court. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that the applicable statute of limitations is the six-month period set forth in Revenue and Taxation Code section 5141, subdivision (a), rather than the general four-year statute of limitations set forth in Code of Civil…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Leal v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World ChristianityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Dillon v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Marshall v. Gibson, Dunn & CrutcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Bogart v. George K. Porter Co.California Supreme Court · 1924
- Stoll v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Committee for Green Foothills v. Santa Clara County Bd. of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Committee for Green Foothills v. Santa Clara County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- State Ex Rel. Metz v. Ccc Information Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- California State University, Fresno Ass'n v. County of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Brandenburg v. EUREKA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCYCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.