Legal Opinion
Brown v. Bailey
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided February 3, 1941PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice DeHaven
This is a suit brought under section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, Title 29, U. S. C. A., Section 216(b), to recover alleged minimum wages, together with an equal amount as liquidated damages and.for allowance of attorney’s fees.
The defendant, Miss Mae Bailey, is a licensed wholesale liquor distributor in Tennessee, with warehouse and business in the City of Chattanooga. It was stipulated in the case that the whisky handled by defendant is purchased outside of the iState of Tennessee, shipped to the defendant’s wholesale house in Chattanooga, Tennessee, and by her sold to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Nashville, C. & St. LR Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Dozier v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States v. Erie RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- State Ex Rel. Fort v. City of JacksonTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
3Cited by6 opinions
- Muldowney v. Seaberg Elevator Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1941
- Walling v. Mutual Wholesale Food & Supply Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1942
- Gibson v. GlasgowTennessee Supreme Court · 1942
- S.H. Robinson Co., Inc. v. LarueCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1941
- Serio v. Dee Cigar & Candy Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.