Legal Opinion

S.H. Robinson Co., Inc. v. Larue

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided August 9, 1941PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPortrum, J.

The plaintiff below, Joe Larue, sues his former employer, S. H. Robinson & Company, Incorporated, for a violation of the federal statute known as “Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938,” 29 U. S. C. A., see. 201 et seq., to recover the minimum standard wage provided by the act for the number of hours worked weekly and in addition for overtime, as provided in the act, and a penalty of double the amount found due him after crediting the amount paid him. The defense is that the employer was not engaged in interstate commerce, and the employee was not employed in interstate business, but he was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Fleming v. A. B. Kirschbaum Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Brown v. BaileyTennessee Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bracey v. LurayCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
  2. Lorenzetti v. American Trust Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1942
  3. S.H. Robinson Co., Inc. v. LarueTennessee Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Bracey v. LurayDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1943
  5. Southern Package Corp. v. WaltonMississippi Supreme Court · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API