Serio v. Dee Cigar & Candy Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BOULDIN, Justice.
Action by an employee against his employer to recover overtime compensation, liquidated damages, and attorney’s fees claimed to be due under the “Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938.” 52 Stat. 1060, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201 to 219.
These sections correspond with .sections 1 to 19 of the original act.
The real issue before us is: Was the plaintiff an employee “engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce,” entitled to the benefits of the wages and hours provisions of sections 6 and 7? If so, he had a cause of action under section 16(b), upon proof of overtime…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Jewel Tea Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- Jax Beer Co. v. RedfernCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- Fleming v. AH Belo CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cudahy Packing Co. of Alabama v. BazanosSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Campbell v. ZaveloSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- Steinberg v. SteinbergSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947