Mullis v. Baker
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Felton, Chief Judge.
“Processioners only have jurisdiction and authority to ascertain and mark anew old lines which have previously been designated on the surface of the earth. They cannot set up a line otherwise. They cannot set up a line merely shown in a deed or plat, or a compromise line not designated on the earth’s surface. Accordingly, a line sought to be set up by processioners from a deed or plat or both, and partially by arbitrary selection of arbitrary and unmarked lines, corners and termini, [is] unauthorized.” Anthony v. Wright, 76 Ga. App. 425 (46 SE2d 194); Goodson v. Pope, 112…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McCollum v. ThomasonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Rich v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Earney v. OwenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Stewart v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Anthony v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wisenbaker v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Fulford v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966