Stewart v. Jackson
Supreme Court of Georgia
Processioning. Before Judge Thomas. Berrien superior court. November 20, 1914. '
1Opinion of the CourtEvans, P. J.
1. In an issue formed upon a protest to the return of processioners, it was not error to refuse to exclude the return from evi-. dence on the ground that the protestant exhibited a notice as having been served on him, in which notice the processioners were described as being of “the 1146th district,” where it appeared from the return that the processioners were of the “1146 district originally, now the 1642nd,” no point being raised as to their authority to act.
2. It is the duty of processioners to respect the actual possession of a landowner held under a claim of right for more than seven…
2Cited by9 opinions
- McCollum v. ThomasonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Earney v. OwenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- International Paper Co. v. KightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Osborne v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Rogers v. BeaversCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.