Legal Opinion

Anthony v. Wright

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 28, 1948No. 31844PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEelton, J.

Processioners only have jurisdiction and authority to ascertain and mark anew old lines which have previously been designated on the surface of the earth. They cannot set up a line otherwise. They cannot set up a line merely shown in a deed or plat, or a compromise line not designated on the earth’s surface. Accordingly, a line sought to be set up by processioners either from deeds or plats, or both, or partially from a deed or plat or both, and partially by arbitrary selection of arbitrary and unmarked lines, corners and termini, was unauthorized. The verdict of the jury upholding the line…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. ClemonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dally v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  2. Freeman v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. Henry v. CrabtreeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  4. Mullis v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  5. Dally v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API