Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority v. North Carolina Industrial Commission
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WHICHARD, Justice.
The primary question is whether adoption of a per diem reimbursement rule and concomitant repeal of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina rule exceeded the North Carolina Industrial Commission’s statutory authority to review and approve hospital charges for services rendered to patients entitled to care under the Workers’ Compensation Act, N.C.G.S. Chapter 97 (1991) (“Act”). For reasons hereinafter stated, we hold that adoption of the per diem rule exceeded the Commission’s statutory authority, but that repeal of the Blue Cross Blue Shield rule did not.
I
The…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Corum v. University of North CarolinaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Rate BureauSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- North Carolina Consumers Power, Inc. v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Adams v. North Carolina Department of Natural & Economic ResourcesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Lide v. MearsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Ray Biggs v. NC Dept of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
- Goldston v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
- Fabrikant v. Currituck CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Myers v. McGradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
- Wal-Mart Stores East, Inc. v. HintonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.