Legal Opinion
Bender v. Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co., Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 8, 1992No. Civ. A. 91-5493 (WGB)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BASSLER, District Judge:
Defendants move to dismiss the complaint, or in the alternative to compel arbitration. For the following reasons defendants’ motion shall be granted in part and denied in part.
I. BACKGROUND.
On June 18, 1990, the plaintiff, Sandra Bender filed an action in this Court against the defendants (civil action number 90-2347) alleging violations of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1985(3), breach of contract, tortious interference with advantageous relationships, defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
On August 10, 1990 defendants filed a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. DonnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Par-Knit Mills, Inc. v. Stockbridge Fabrics Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Linda Willis v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. DistajoDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1996
- In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- Bender v. Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
- Woody v. City of DuluthDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
- Brown v. Ocwen Federal Bank (In Re Brown)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.