Legal Opinion

Woody v. City of Duluth

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided September 8, 1997No. CIV.97-871(MJD/RLE)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DAVIS, District Judge.

Based upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Raymond L. Erickson, and after an independent review of the files, records and proceedings in the above-titled matter, it is—

ORDERED:

1. That plaintiffs informal Motion to voluntarily dismiss his claims against the State of Minnesota, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, shall be, and hereby is, granted.

2. That the State of Minnesota’s Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 2] shall be, and hereby is, denied, as moot.

3. That the State of Minnesota’s, informal Motion for an Award…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sealy, L.L.C. v. BanksSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  2. Ex Parte Sealy, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  3. Cruz-Mendez v. HOSPITAL GENERAL CASTAÑER, INC.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2009
  4. Canady v. Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020
  5. Lorraine Flint et al. v. Feit Electric Company, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API