Legal Opinion

State v. Hensley

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 24, 1978No. 28PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice.

Defendant’s first assignment of error is directed to two allegedly leading questions directed to Betty, the prosecuting witness, and to two such questions directed to the witness, Lois Lowery.

We see no merit in this assignment.

The trial court has discretionary authority to permit leading questions in proper instances, and absent a showing of prejudice the discretionary action of the trial court will not be disturbed. State v. Young, 291 N.C. 562, 231 S.E. 2d 577 (1976); State v. Willis, 281 N.C. 558, 189 S.E. 2d 190 (1972); State v. Pearson, 258 N.C. 188, 128 S.E. 2d 251…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Avery v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Ellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Entsminger v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. State v. CutlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. HutchinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. DetterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. CartwrightCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  5. State v. ArsenaultCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API