Legal Opinion

State v. Detter

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 4, 1979No. 2PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPELAND, Justice.

Defendant has properly presented twenty-three assignments of error to this Court.

By her first assignment of error, defendant contends that the trial judge erred in denying her two motions for a bill of particulars pursuant to G.S. 15A-925.

G.S. 15A-925 provides in relevant part that:

“(b) A motion for a bill of particulars must request and specify items of factual information desired by the defendant which pertain to the charge and which are not recited in the pleading, and must allege that the defendant cannot adequately prepare or conduct his defense without such…

2Cases cited75 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. State v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. AlstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. RookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. GibbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  5. State v. GrierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API