Legal Opinion
State v. Arsenault
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided April 1, 1980No. 7915SC965PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERWIN, Judge.
Defendant contends that he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to the effective assistance of counsel at his trial.
In State v. Sneed, 284 N.C. 606, 612, 201 S.E. 2d 867, 871 (1974), Justice Branch (now Chief Justice), speaking for our Supreme Court on this subject, stated:
“Neither the United States Supreme Court, nor this Court, has fashioned a rule to guide us in determining whether an accused was denied his Constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel due to counsel’s negligence, in-comptency [sic], conflicting loyalties or other similar reasons. However, there are…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. SneedSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. SladeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- United States v. Scott DonahueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. WiseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. YeltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. LeggettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. SummerfordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. BrewingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.