Legal Opinion

Entsminger v. Iowa

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 12, 1967No. 252PublishedCited by 224 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark

This case, which was argued following Anders v. California, ante, p. 738, presents a similar problem in that we are here also concerned with the constitutional requirements which are binding on a State in the administration of its appellate criminal procedures with respect to convicted indigents - seeking initial review of their convictions. Petitioner, who was represented at trial by a court-appointed attorney, was convicted of uttering a forged instrument in violation of Iowa law. Shortly after the verdict was rendered, he requested the trial court to appoint different counsel to aid him in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Smith v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Lane v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Ellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by224 opinions

  1. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. State v. FranklinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Wayne Dale Schell v. Larry Witek, Warden Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, State of California, 1Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Ben Lee Brown v. Walter E. CravenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  5. In Re AntazoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

219 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API