Entsminger v. Iowa
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark
This case, which was argued following Anders v. California, ante, p. 738, presents a similar problem in that we are here also concerned with the constitutional requirements which are binding on a State in the administration of its appellate criminal procedures with respect to convicted indigents - seeking initial review of their convictions. Petitioner, who was represented at trial by a court-appointed attorney, was convicted of uttering a forged instrument in violation of Iowa law. Shortly after the verdict was rendered, he requested the trial court to appoint different counsel to aid him in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Smith v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Lane v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Ellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by224 opinions
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. FranklinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Wayne Dale Schell v. Larry Witek, Warden Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, State of California, 1Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Ben Lee Brown v. Walter E. CravenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- In Re AntazoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
219 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.