Holm v. Holm
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Third District; Hon. George G. Armstrong, Judge. Action, by Mary Holm v. Jacob Holm for divorce. Decree for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtStratjp, J.
This is an action for divorce. The grounds alleged by the plaintiff are failure to provide and habitual drunkenness. The defendant answered, denying these allegations and counterclaimed on grounds of adultery and cruelty. The plaintiff replied, denying the counterclaim. Evidence was adduced by both parties with respect to all these issues. Most of it relates to the issues presented by the counterclaim. Upon a submission of the case the court announced, “I will grant a divorce” to the plaintiff. Counsel asked what the finding would be on the adultery charge. The court replied: “Well, I won’t…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Everett v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1907
- Dillon Implement Co. v. CleavelandUtah Supreme Court · 1906
- Mitchell v. JensenUtah Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by12 opinions
- Baker v. Hatch, SheriffUtah Supreme Court · 1927
- George v. Fritsch Loan & Trust Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1927
- Baird v. Upper Canal Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1927
- Piper v. EakleUtah Supreme Court · 1931
- Duncan v. Hemmelwright Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1947
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.