Legal Opinion
Carolina Chloride, Inc. v. Richland County
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided July 25, 2011No. 27013PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Beatty
Carolina Chloride, Inc. brought this action against Richland County alleging the County incorrectly advised it of the legal zoning classification of its property and that it lost a potential sale of the property due to the zoning issue. The trial judge directed a verdict for the County on all of Carolina Chloride’s claims. The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded as to the claims for negligence and negligent misrepresentation, but upheld the directed verdict as to Carolina Chloride’s remaining claims. Richland County v. Carolina Chloride, Inc., 382 S.C. 634, 677 S.E.2d 892 (Ct.App.2009). 1…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Wilder Corp. v. WilkeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Steinke v. South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing & RegulationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Sauner v. Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
- Welch v. EpsteinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State v. BlackSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
- Hotel & Motel Holdings, LLC v. BJC Enterprises, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015
- Town of Hollywood v. FloydSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
- Dunes West Golf Club, LLC v. Town of Mount PleasantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
- Henderson v. Summerville Ford-Mercury Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.