Henderson v. Summerville Ford-Mercury Inc.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Beatty
In a matter of first impression, the Court is asked to determine if an unsuccessful party in an arbitration proceeding may prevent the confirmation of an award by paying the award prior to the confirmation proceeding. The answer is no.
Diane Henderson (“Henderson”) filed an action against Summerville Ford-Mercury, Inc. (“Dealer”) alleging Dealer made misrepresentations to Henderson when she purchased a used vehicle. The circuit court granted Dealer’s motion to compel arbitration, and an arbitrator found for Henderson on her claims for violation of the South Carolina Unfair Trade Practices Act…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Hall Street Associates, L. L. C. v. Mattel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Munoz v. Green Tree Financial Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Badgerow v. WaltersSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
- Ronnisch Construction Group, Inc v. Lofts on the Nine, LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
- AURC III, LLC v. Point Ruston Phase II, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2024
- Carlton Energy Group, LLC v. Cliveden Petroleum Company LimitedDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2023
- Carlton Energy Group, LLC v. Cliveden Petroleum Company LimitedDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.