Legal Opinion
In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Mackay
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided October 26, 1964No. ABA 8PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AREND, Justice.
The Alaska Bar Association commenced this disciplinary proceeding in 1961 by filing a complaint against the respondent, Neil S. Maclcay, charging him with misconduct in his office as an attorney and counselor at law and with violating his oath as an attorney and counselor by cheating or over-reaching a client. The complaint was later amended by the addition of two more charges, namely, purchase by the respondent of an interest in a suit of his client and lack of candor be*827fore the court. All charges were denied by the respondent.
The matter came on for hearing in September 1961…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re HallinanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Martin v. WaltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Martin v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
- Ruckenbrod v. MullinsUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of FarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- DeLisio v. Alaska Superior CourtAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. Native Village of NunapitchukAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Citizens Coalition for Tort Reform, Inc. v. McAlpineAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- In Re MannWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1967
- In Re the Disciplinary Matter Involving SimpsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.