Legal Opinion

Martin v. Davis

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 10, 1960No. 42,026PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fatzeb, J.:

At issue is the power of the supreme court of Kansas to control and supervise the practice of law before the courts of the state by Kansas licensed attorneys regularly engaged in the practice of law in another state.

The action was one in mandamus to compel the appellee, the probate judge of Johnson County, Kansas, to permit the plaintiff, Keith Martin, to file cases in that court and to appear and try them without the appearance or association of local counsel as required by Rules 41 and 54 of this court, amended December 15, 1958, and to…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. Konigsberg v. State Bar of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Manzanares v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  2. State Ex Rel. Schneider v. LiggettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  3. State Ex Rel. Stephan v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  4. Martin v. WaltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Tri-State Hotel Co. v. LonderholmSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API