Legal Opinion
Shannon v. Recording Industry Ass'n of America
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 30, 1987No. C-2-84-1565PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HOLSCHUH, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Donald and Rose Shannon bring this action under the provisions of 15 U.S.C. § 1, et seq., the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the United States Constitution, and various state law causes of action. In an order issued February 24, 1986, this Court dismissed defendant William Hunt from this action, dismissed plaintiffs’ claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(2), and dismissed counts III, IV, V, and VII against defendants Chretien and Mitchell. The only claims which remain against those defendants are Bivens claims under the Fourth and Fifth…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Friedman v. Estate of PresserCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Ruff v. RunyonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Johnson v. CullenDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1996
- Okan's Foods, Inc. v. Windsor Associates Ltd. Partnership (In Re Okan's Foods, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- Filer v. PolstonDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.