Legal Opinion
Mikita v. Bailey Homes, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 19, 1979No. 557 and 558PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HESTER, Judge:
There is no division in this court as to the appeal of Peter Mikita, et ux. filed at numbers 557 and 558 April Term, 1978. After taking an appeal from the Arbitrators’ Award, Mikitas took no further action. Notice of said appeal was not served upon the opposing party. This was in complete disregard of the requirements of Rule No. 306(a)(1) of the Allegheny County Rules of Civil Procedure. Our reasoning is completely set forth in the dissenting opinion of Price, J. We will affirm the orders of the court below which quashed this appeal.
As to the appeal of Builders Supply Company,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Meta v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Black & Brown, Inc. v. Home for the Accepted, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Beth-Allen Sales Co. v. Hartford Insurance GroupSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Gable v. CHINTALASuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Holmes v. BroodnoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Murphy v. ArmstrongSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Miller v. HildSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Grossman v. MitchellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Hines v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Sargo, II, Inc. v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.