Legal Opinion

Grossman v. Mitchell

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 16, 1981No. 1910PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTGOMERY, Judge:

Plaintiff-Appellee Frank Grossman, c/o Cedarbrook Realty, initiated an action in the Municipal Court of Philadelphia to recover possession of certain real estate in the city of Philadelphia, and for back rent allegedly due under a lease of same entered into between him and Robert and Christine Pierson. Grossman secured a judgment for possession of the premises but his claim for back rent was denied due to the uninhabitable condition of the property, and judgment was entered for the tenants on this claim. He appealed to the Court of Common Pleas from the judgment entered for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Turner v. May Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Black & Brown, Inc. v. Home for the Accepted, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Caples v. KlugmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. C. B. Co. v. Rostraver Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Mikita v. Bailey Homes, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pennridge Electric, Inc. v. Souderton Area Joint School AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Zelenak v. MikulaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. City of Philadelphia v. SilvermanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. SamekCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Crookes v. CrookesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API