People of Enewetak, Rongelap, and Other Marshall Islands Atolls v. The United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
NIES, Circuit Judge.
These appeals are from the final judgments of the Claims Court in Peter v. United States, 13 Cl.Ct. 691 (1987), and Nitol v. United States, 13 Cl.Ct. 690 (1987), dismissing the complaints of inhabitants of the Enewetak, Rongelap, and other Marshall Islands Atolls for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. In dismissing the subject complaints, the Claims Court relied on its decision of the same date in Juda v. United States, 13 Cl.Ct. 667 (1987), 1 a closely related case involving claims by inhabitants of Bikini Atoll. In Juda, the Claims Court held that it lacked subject…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Dames & Moore v. ReganSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Juda v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
- People of Bikini, Enewetak, Rongelap, Utrik and Other Marshall Islands Atolls v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cathelina Antolok v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Doe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- People of Bikini v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- John v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Cathelina Antolok v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.