Legal Opinion

Poole v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1959PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

Defendant claims that there was no credible evidence to sustain the jury finding that Poole was negligent as to management and control. Defendant relies upon decisions which have been summarized by the court as follows: “Out of these cases must be read the rule that skidding may occur without fault, and that the mere fact of its occurrence will not support a finding or inference of negligence.” Coenen v. Van Handel (1955), 269 Wis. 6, 8, 68 N. W. (2d) 435.

*69The validity of this rule is not questioned. In the cases referred to, however, the cars involved have been in a position or movement from…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Linden v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Henthorn v. M. G. C. Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Zeinemann v. GasserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Van Matre v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Transport Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Williams v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Voigt v. VoigtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Fields v. CreekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Goldenberg v. DaaneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Abbott v. Truck Insurance Exchange Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Fields v. CreekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API