Legal Opinion

Van Matre v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Transport Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1955PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGehl, J.

Question 1 of the special verdict inquired whether the injuries resulted from an unavoidable accident. The jury answered in the negative. The court instructed the jury that the burden of proof to establish an affirmative answer to the question was upon the defendant. Defendant contends that the burden was erroneously placed. We have found but one Wisconsin case which may be considered as dealing with the question as to who has the burden to prove unavoidable accident when it is in issue. In Murray v. Yellow Cab Co. (1923), 180 Wis. 314, 192 N. W. 1021, a negli gence case, the court refused to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Polk v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Jolley v. ClemensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Cupps v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Reynolds v. Madison Bus Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Hardman v. YounkersWashington Supreme Court · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. After Hour Welding, Inc. v. Laneil Management Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Taylor v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Hancock-Underwood v. KnightSupreme Court of Virginia · 2009
  4. Fry v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. Coenen v. Van HandelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API