Legal Opinion

Voigt v. Voigt

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1964PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.

Introduction of Accident Report.

The appellants contend that the trial court erred in refusing to admit into evidence the accident report which contained a statement attributable to Mr. Voigt. We conclude that the trial court properly rejected the offer of this report into evidence. The statement was taken about a half hour after the accident by Deputy Sheriff Joe Norris, who interviewed Mr. Voigt at the hospital. Norris submitted his accident report to the county sheriff’s office, but he died before the trial. Under the heading “remarks,” Norris reported Mr. Voigt’s statement that the Voigt…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Strnad v. Co-Operative Insurance MutualWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Evjen v. Packer City Transit Line, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Carstensen v. FaberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Pagel v. HolewinskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Goldenberg v. DaaneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Lambrecht v. Estate of KaczmarczykWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Bartell v. LuedtkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Wilder v. Classified Risk InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Cathleen Geehan v. Richard S. MonahanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
  5. Holten v. ParkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API