Johnson v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP.
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PELANDER, Justice.
¶ 1 Arizona Rule of Evidence 407 generally excludes evidence of “measures” taken “after an event” to prove a party’s negligence or culpability “in connection with the event.” We hold that Rule 407 applies even if the party took such measures without knowledge of, or for reasons unrelated to, the prior event. We also hold that the trial court did not err in finding that the evidence of subsequent measures was not offered for “another purpose.”
I
¶ 2 This wrongful death action arose from a collision in which decedent Mark Johnson, while driving westbound on U.S. Highway…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Minter v. Prime Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Tennie Martin, et.al. v. Southern Railway Company, et.al.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- Herzog v. Lexington TownshipIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
- Forrest A. Flaminio and Gloria Flaminio v. Honda Motor Company, Ltd., a Japanese CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- State v. HansenArizona Supreme Court · 2007
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United Tool Rental, Inc. v. Riverside Contracting, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2011
- Brown v. Fisher-PriceSuperior Court of Delaware · 2025
- Johns v. CR BardDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
- Milanesi v. C.R. Bard, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
- Saban Rent-A-Car LLC v. Ariz. Dep't of RevenueArizona Supreme Court · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.