Saban Rent-A-Car LLC v. Ariz. Dep't of Revenue
Arizona Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBolick, J.
¶41 The majority today concludes that our constitution's anti-diversion clause, which requires that revenues derived from taxes relating to the operation of motor vehicles must be allocated for public highways, does not apply to a tax relating to the operation of motor vehicles. Because I believe that the best route to a constitutional destination is usually a straight line, I must forsake the majority's circuitous journey. I therefore respectfully dissent from Part II of the majority opinion, while joining the Court's Commerce Clause analysis with some reservations.
Anti-diversion Clause
¶42…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Hughes v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Camps Newfound/Owatonna, Inc. v. Town of HarrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Commonwealth Edison Co. v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Granholm v. HealdSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.