Legal Opinion

Milanesi v. C.R. Bard, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided December 13, 2021No. 2:18-cv-01320Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION IN RE: DAVOL, INC./C.R. BARD, Case No. 2:18-md-2846 INC., POLYPROPYLENE HERNIA MESH PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR. Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson This document relates to: Milanesi v. C.R. Bard, Case No. 2:18-cv-01320 MOTIONS IN LIMINE OPINION AND ORDER NO. 40 Defendants’ Motion in Limine (“MIL”) No. 6 Defendants C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc. filed a Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence and Argument Concerning Foreign Regulatory Actions (Defendants’ MIL No. 6, ECF No. 178), which is…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Tennie Martin, et.al. v. Southern Railway Company, et.al.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Lawrence R. Sperberg v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API