Legal Opinion

Terry v. Price Municipal Corp.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1989No. 870445PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs appeal from portions of a judgment following a bench trial on their action against Price City which disputed the alignment and construction of 300 North and Cedar Hills Drive in Price City, Utah. To the extent pertinent to this appeal, the trial court found that (1) Price City was not estopped from placing its right-of-way along Cedar Hills Drive within ten to fifteen feet from the foundation of plaintiffs’ home, (2) plaintiffs had trespassed upon that right-of-way and were liable for resulting damages, and (3) plaintiffs had failed to present a prima facie case that the easement…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of BartellUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Reid v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
  3. CECO Corp. v. Concrete Specialists, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Utah State University of Agriculture & Applied Science v. Sutro & Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Forsman v. ForsmanUtah Supreme Court · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ault v. HoldenUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
  3. Hoth v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  4. Jarman v. Reagan Outdoor Advertising Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  5. Mont Trucking, Inc. v. Entrada Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API