Legal Opinion

Forsman v. Forsman

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1989No. 860430PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Chief Justice:

Plaintiff was injured while a passenger in an automobile driven by her husband, George Forsman, which collided with an automobile owned by the Utah Department of Public Safety and driven by its employee, Ronald Flinders. Plaintiff thereupon sued both her husband and Flinders for damages sustained as a result of the collision.1

The trial court granted summary judgment of dismissal, concluding that plaintiff’s cause of action against her husband was barred by the doctrine of interspousal immunity and that her cause of action against Flinders was barred by failure to give…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Emery v. EmeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1966
  3. Klein v. KleinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Schwartz v. SchwartzArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Rice v. Granite School DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Waddoups v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Mountain Fuel Supply, a Utah Corporation, and Cna Insurance Company v. Reliance Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  3. Warren v. Provo City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Chambers v. Dakotah Charter, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Viernow v. Euripides Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API