Legal Opinion

Mauney v. Mauney

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 12, 1966No. 203PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.

Civil contempt and criminal contempt are distinguishable. “It is essential to the due administration of justice in this field of the law that the fundamental distinction between a proceeding for contempt under G.S. 5-1 and a proceeding as for contempt under G.S. 5-8 be recognized and enforced. The importance of the' distinction lies in differences in the procedure, the punishment, and the right of review established by law for the two proceedings.” Luther v. Luther, 234 N.C. 429, 67 S.E. 2d 345.

The case of Dyer v. Dyer, 213 N.C. 634, 197 S.E. 157, held: “Criminal contempt is a term applied…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lamm v. . LammSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. Yow v. YowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. In Re HegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  4. Luther v. LutherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Dyer v. . DyerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. O'Briant v. O'BriantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. McBride v. McBrideSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  3. United Artists Records, Inc. v. Eastern Tape Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  4. Henderson v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Teachey v. TeacheyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API