Phelps v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellant Royal Phelps was injured while driving his employer’s vehicle. Phelps made claims against his employer’s underinsured/uninsured motorist (UM) and workmen’s compensation coverage and, additionally, against his own private disability coverage. However, the amount recovered from these sources was insufficient to cover his total damages, and Phelps therefore made a claim against his own UM coverage held by respondent State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm). State Farm only paid Phelps the difference between his total damages and what he had received from other…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Ellison v. California State Automobile Ass'nNevada Supreme Court · 1990
- Zgombic v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. ChurchArizona Supreme Court · 1973
- Maxwell v. Allstate Insurance CompaniesNevada Supreme Court · 1986
- Mid-Century Insurance v. DanielNevada Supreme Court · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by10 opinions
- Elyousef v. O'REILLY & FERRARIO, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2010
- Rubin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 2002
- Fernandez v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 2018
- Gillen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- Anna Rubin v. State Farm Mutual Automobil Insurance Company, Certifying TheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.