Legal Opinion

Rubin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 2002No. 36631PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Maupin, C. L:

In this case, we are asked by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to answer two certified questions:

1. Under Nevada law, does a provision in an automobile insurance policy excluding coverage for medical expenses resulting from bodily injury for which workers’ compensation is payable apply to medical expenses that are paid by workers’ compensation but recovered from a third-party tortfeasor?

2. If the exclusionary clause is interpreted to apply to those expenses, does it violate Nevada public policy?

As we conclude that the policy exclusion…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. National Union Fire Insurance v. Reno's Executive Air, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Harvey's Wagon Wheel, Inc. v. MacSweenNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Breen v. Caesars PalaceNevada Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Antram v. Stuyvesant Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. ASAP Storage, Inc. v. City of SparksNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Jenkins v. City of ElkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Star Insurance Co. v. NeighborsNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Doneson v. Farmers Ins. Exch.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  5. Anna Rubin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API