Legal Opinion

In Re Wilputte S.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 23, 2004No. 1 CA-MH 04-0007 SPPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WTNTHROP, Judge.

¶ 1 The State, through the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office (“MCAO”), appeals from the trial court’s orders finding that probable cause does not exist to detain Wilputte S. (“W.S.”) as a sexually violent person (“SVP”) and releasing W.S. from the custody of the Arizona Community Protection and Treatment Center. For the reasons discussed, we affirm the trial court’s orders.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶ 2 On June 15, 1993, W.S. pled guilty to one count of attempted sexual conduct with a minor and one count of attempted sexual exploitation of a minor. On August 27,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Larson v. FarleyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Walter v. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  3. State v. FlyntCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  4. State v. HoggattCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  5. Bustos v. W.M. Grace DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Yarbrough v. Montoya-PaezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  2. Parker, Springer Jr., Anderson v. Committee for Sustainable Retirement in Support of InitiativeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  3. In Re Eric W.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  4. YARBROUGH v. ROBERTS ENTERPRISES, DeWITT, AVATOR HOLDINGSCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API