In Re Wilputte S.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WTNTHROP, Judge.
¶ 1 The State, through the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office (“MCAO”), appeals from the trial court’s orders finding that probable cause does not exist to detain Wilputte S. (“W.S.”) as a sexually violent person (“SVP”) and releasing W.S. from the custody of the Arizona Community Protection and Treatment Center. For the reasons discussed, we affirm the trial court’s orders.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶ 2 On June 15, 1993, W.S. pled guilty to one count of attempted sexual conduct with a minor and one count of attempted sexual exploitation of a minor. On August 27,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Larson v. FarleyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Walter v. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- State v. FlyntCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- State v. HoggattCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Bustos v. W.M. Grace DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
3Cited by4 opinions
- Yarbrough v. Montoya-PaezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Parker, Springer Jr., Anderson v. Committee for Sustainable Retirement in Support of InitiativeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- In Re Eric W.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- YARBROUGH v. ROBERTS ENTERPRISES, DeWITT, AVATOR HOLDINGSCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006