Parker, Springer Jr., Anderson v. Committee for Sustainable Retirement in Support of Initiative
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VÁSQUEZ, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 In this expedited election appeal, Yolanda Parker, John Springer Jr., and Chris Anderson (jointly, the Employees) 1 challenge the trial court’s September 3, 2013 order denying their request for injunctive and mandamus relief, entering judgment in favor of the Committee for Sustainable Retirement in Support of Initiative Petition 2013-1004 and in Support of the Ballot Measure (the Committee) and numerous government defendants, 2 and permitting the City of Tucson Initiative Petition 2013-1004 (the Initiative) to be placed on the November 5, 2013 ballot.…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Kent K. v. Bobby M.Arizona Supreme Court · 2005
- Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Ariz., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Jett v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Jaime a Molera v. Katie HobbsArizona Supreme Court · 2020
- Debra Arrett and Shirley Lamonna v. Julie K. BowerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- State of Arizona v. Reuben Renee CotaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Tucson Unified School District v. BorekCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Judith K Lohr v. Shawnna BolickArizona Supreme Court · 2020
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.