Legal Opinion

State v. Flynt

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 30, 2000No. 2 CA-CR 98-0498PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DRUKE, Judge.

¶ 1 In Arizona, a defendant found guilty except insane, rather than simply guilty, must be committed to the jurisdiction of the psychiatric security review board for a term equal to a guilty defendant’s prison sentence if the trial court finds, pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-502(D), that the defendant’s conduct “involved the death or physical injury of or a substantial threat of death or physical injury to another person.” Absent such a finding, the defendant is potentially entitled to release or civil commitment proceedings within seventy-five days of the court’s commitment order. See…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Larson v. FarleyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  2. State v. KorzepArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. LopezArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. GetzArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. WomackCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cypress on Sunland Homeowners Ass'n v. OrlandiniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  2. State v. MENDOZA-TAPIACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  3. State of Arizona v. Daniel Andrew SniderCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  4. Hosea v. City of Phoenix Fire Pension BoardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  5. In Re Wilputte S.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API