Melville, Gdn. v. Greyhound Corp.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHildebrant, J.
The Common Pleas Court sustained the demurrer of defendant Briol to the amended petition on the grounds of misjoinder of causes of action and parties defendant and that the facts contained in such petition failed to state a cause of action against him. Plaintiff, not desiring to plead over, appeals on questions of law.
The allegations of the petition admitted to be true upon demurrer, in substance, are that on June 3, 1950, at about 3 p. m., plaintiff’s ward was a guest-passenger in the automobile of defendant Briol, being driven by him in a southerly direction on U. S. route No. 42, between…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tighe v. DiamondOhio Supreme Court · 1948
- Universal Concrete Pipe Co. v. BassettOhio Supreme Court · 1936
- Nichols v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- Reserve Trucking Co. v. FairchildOhio Supreme Court · 1934
- Blessing v. WeldingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Williams v. CarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Gossett v. JacksonOhio Court of Appeals · 1965
- Robertson v. HavensOhio Court of Appeals · 1957
- Williams v. CarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968