Williams v. Carr
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
By a vote of 10 to 2 the jury returned a verdict for defendant in this action to recover for personal injuries sustained when defendant’s car struck an electric *582pole. Plaintiff, who was a guest in the car, has appealed from the ensuing judgment.
There is very little conflict in the evidence.
On Friday, July 20, 1962, defendant, a Naval officer, arose about 5:30 a.m. and went to work. After work, about 4 p.m., defendant thought he might have had a beer although his memory was unclear. About 6 :30 in the evening, he met plaintiff, Ensign Kent (a Wave officer), and Ensign Harris in the lobby of…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Seeger v. OdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- McCann v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Meek v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Cope v. DavisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Donnelly v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
- Brown v. MerloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Calvillo-Silva v. Home GroceryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Kwan v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Ewing v. Cloverleaf BowlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.