Reserve Trucking Co. v. Fairchild
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBevis, J.
The plaintiff contended that the defendant was negligent, basing his contention upon the facts pleaded and proved, and upon the violation of an ordinance of the City of Akron which prohibited turning in the street unless the turn could be made without backing. The plaintiff claimed that Sections 6310-26 and 6310-27, General Code, relating to stopping on a highway, were also violated.
The defendant contended that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence. This contention was denied by the plaintiff, who claimed, moreover, that the defense of contributory negligence was not available…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Suell v. DerricottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Rost v. F. H. Noble & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1925
- Tucker v. State Ex Rel. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
- Fry v. Southern Public Utilities Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- W. A. Morgan & Bros. v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Anderson v. City of MassillonOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- Tighe v. DiamondOhio Supreme Court · 1948
- Universal Concrete Pipe Co. v. BassettOhio Supreme Court · 1936
- Masters v. New York Central Rd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1947
- McKinney v. Hartz & Restle Realtors, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.