Legal Opinion

Clark v. Carson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 13, 1961No. 42,248PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fatzer, J.:

Except for specifications of error hereafter noted, we are presented with another factual appeal prompted by the de fendant’s dissatisfaction with the verdict of the jury and the judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $651.28.

The plaintiff sought to recover damages to his automobile resulting from a collision with a cow. The second amended petition alleged the defendant negligently and unlawfully failed to properly fence the area of his farm where his cattle were confined in that the wire was loose and thereby they were able to go through…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ziegelasch v. DurrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  2. Wilson v. RuleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  3. Paph v. Tri-State Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  4. Abbott v. HowardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  5. Morris Ex Rel. Morris v. MusicsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cooper v. EberlySupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  2. Parker v. ReterOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Shuck v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
  4. Walborn v. StockmanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1985
  5. Wrinkle v. NormanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API