Wrinkle v. Norman
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Per curiam
The appellant, Rodney Wrinkle, was injured in the course of providing aid to a calf that he was escorting onto a neighbor s property. He sued to recover medical damages from the neighbor, and the district court granted the Normans’ motion for summary judgment. Because the district court applied the incorrect standard for the duty of care in this case, we remand for die submission of new arguments predicated on the proper duty.
Based on the pleadings and the record developed through deposition testimony, the circumstances of Wrinkle’s injuiy were as follows:
*421On the aftemaon of March 10, 2006,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jones v. HansenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
- McKissick v. FryeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
- Wilson v. RuleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
- Clark v. CarsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
- Lange v. Fisher Real Estate Development Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Colby Hines v. Railserve, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Gouldner v. Monarch Investments & Management Group, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2023
- Hines v. Railserve, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Jason Sleater v. Richard Griffith I, et uxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- Kelly v. Morton Salt, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.